I get the distinct impression you keep pushing for someone, CAA, BADA, individual or delegated authority to publicly announce it could have - may have - might have been pilot error in advance of the final AAIB report. Its becoming tiresome that you keep banging on about the same points without listening to others who have experience in FJ displays.
Negative. The cause of the crash could be anything but it doesn't prevent seeking clarity on events up to that point. I don't see CAP403 as a fast jet only document and nothing that relates to the point being debated seems to place any special application to fast jets. I just wanted to know what the situation was and as we can see there is huge push back to answer what should be a very straight forward question.
Is the Daily Telegraph headline wrong and why?