What are you suggesting?
I'm suggesting that this shouldn't be a point of debate at all in Feb 2016.
I'd have thought that when the Sept 2015 AAIB bulletin printed some numbers that got turned into headlines that someone from the CAA, BADA or individuals involved with delegated authority could have put those numbers into some sort of context.
I've not seen that done to date. Why? Perhaps an aviation journalist could ask the question of the relevant body/person and publish a clear picture in a magazine? That would be value add wouldn't it?
It seems a little unfair to let a pilot dangle for 6 months under the cloud of these numbers if all was deemed to be well.
It is not quite so simple, and more than one pair of eyes is used, but essentially yes.
This is not unreasonable.
I personally would totally agree with that. It is perfectly reasonable it just seems to date nobody who had that authority feels it appropriate or has enough confidence to comment, when in other matters they have been very quick indeed.