Originally Posted by
Car RAMROD
Without diving into the regs to clarify, by the sound of it I suspect you are getting a little confused.
If someone is licensed to fly the 210 in your example, you are licensed to fly the 182rg. The CP is not training you for any endorsements or ratings. They still have responsibilities under CAO 82 for check and training, and I do believe that teaching them your SOPs on the 182 is not considered "training" by way of the definition of "training".
Training in the sense of the defined word would be teaching someone without csu/rg ratings to operate an aircraft with such features.
Yes I agree with your interpretation pre Part 61. To understand the way CASA looks at things now you need to read 61.385 and 61.1165(e). CAO 82 only talks about "Check Pilot", not training. I'm going through an exercise with CASA now on this subject, a CAO 82.5 Check and Training Pilot is not considered to be qualified to instruct. This matter is definitely a gotcha and I suspect is going to be tested soon in relation to a recent incident.