I note that Western Media mantra is all about Russian aggression where as anything NATO members do seems to be seen as being ok
What NATO 'aggression' has there been racedo?
The Russian Fencer was shot down for entering Turkish airspace (the Russians have gone very quiet on the subject after the initial furore), and if you're referring to the NATO 'expansion' East, that has only occurred because these nations have asked to join NATO because they fear Russia.
You'll also note that it wasn't NATO that used force of arms to change European borders, and it's not NATO that continues to fatally undermine a sovereign European state for the opaque reasons of its autocratic leader. It wasn't NATO either that shot down a civilian airliner killing nearly 300 innocent people (despite what RT has to say on the subject).
If the Western media mantra is all about Russian aggression, then they're just calling it as it is.