I said it is about EVERYTHING ELSE !
Is it fair to say the only way to balance the books and run a surplus on GA, training, cargo and fuel stops is to lose the cost of the 1965 terminal and the aspiration for commercial passenger ops?
Is that fair?
There's no money to build a proper loco terminal even if they had someone wanting one and the current facility is a huge drag as it had had nothing but cosmetic tweaks since it opened and it's not attractive to prospective airlines.