After removing the turn radius computations, but leaving in the discussion about how the ALPA came to the wrong conclusions, I put it back up.
http://we.tl/InGXbDKkkX
I'm working on a draft that starts at the final wreckage site and works backwards. We'll see if that one works better.
The problem with the chronological approach is that it's vital to understand the bank angle, but there's not any direct evidence until the right wing impact. People seem to come to a mental halt before that, because I'm disagreeing with the official reports on what is (at that point of the crash) thin evidence. Maybe if I start with the most obvious error I'll be able to carry the reader along better.