Originally Posted by PittsExtra
APG - so when you read nothing conclusive to date, you'd agree with that?
Try reading his post again, properly this time. He clearly disagrees with your statement. There is also a big difference between, "nothing conclusive to date" and "no other conclusive technical issues have been found to date."
Originally Posted by PittsExtra
If aspects related to safety have been uncovered and affect other aircraft types that are currently flying, there is a duty to highlight them as soon as possible whether or not they are causal to the accident under investigation.
It's easy to see from you bold where your erroneous supposition has lead you to the wrong conclusion. Let's try it another way,
If aspects related to safety have been uncovered and affect other aircraft types that are currently flying, there is a duty to highlight them as soon as possible whether or not they are causal to the accident under investigation.
If the technical [or other] issues identified thus far do not affect other types currently flying or it is not POSSIBLE to report them yet, then they will not do so. That does not mean that aspects related to safety have not been uncovered; they have simply not been reported yet for reasons I would not expect you either to understand or to agree with - you are, after all one of the experts here that appear all over PPRuNe whenever there has been an accident. IIRC, you were able to deduce all sorts of conclusive findings just from a single hand held video back on 25 August.
You seem to thrive on speculation that someone did something wrong. You should write for the daily mail. You certainly should not consider a career in accident investigation.