PPRuNe Forums - View Single Post - NPA 2015-20 : a chance to get rid of dead wood
Old 19th Dec 2015, 11:38
  #6 (permalink)  
Mach Jump
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Yorkshire
Posts: 1,113
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
NPA 2015-20 proposes only very light oversight requirements, but the scope of training isn't as comprehensive as that proposed by NPA 2014-28, which would have covered all associated ratings and certificates which could be included in a PPL - such as MEP and IR. However, the UK CAA is planning to release an AltMoC for noncomplex ATOs to meet that need.
Lets hope that it's the Facility that's 'Approved', rather than individual courses. For instance, it seems absurd that a facility approved to conduct PPLs, would have to apply for additional approval to conduct LAPLs, and LAPL-PPL 'upgrade' courses, in the same way that those who have approval to conduct IR training at present, have to apply for further approval to conduct CBIR training. Also, let's get rid of the need to list individual aircraft and individual instructors in the 'Approval'. This is just a pain in the ass, and serves no purpose. (And seems to be widely ignored anyway.)

BEagle: Is the target date for this when the present state of limbo expires in 2018, or could we possibly see the new rules introduced earlier? And are new applicants for 'Approval' going to be treated the same as existing RFs?


MJ

Last edited by Mach Jump; 19th Dec 2015 at 12:56. Reason: Added question for BEagle
Mach Jump is offline