Originally Posted by
Kulverstukas
It's nothing to do with MAK, bomb "evidence" came from FSB which makes analysis of "samples" collected by EMERCOM rescue team. So it's part of criminal investigation not one carried out under ICAO rules.
and then:
" . . . . the committee
did not receive up till now any information indicating unlawful interference, consequently the committee continues its work regarding the technical investigation."
Kulverstukas, do you also read the sentence quoted above from the news item about issuance of the preliminary report to mean that the investigation committee is tacitly (or not so tacitly) stating that it has not received any outputs from the [paraphrasing] analysis by the FSB of samples collected by EMERCOM rescue teams? If that is not how you would read that sentence, then what, if anything, are the investigation authorities in Egypt saying about the subject analysis, samples and so on?