- The SIC was pulling more that the PIC was pushing but the PIC could not see it so was not able to understand the situation.
- Initially the SIC responded correctly to the first STALL warning but not to the second one ... Was he preoccupied by the bank angle, was he trying to follow that "pull down" ambiguous directive from the PIC or was he chasing unrealistic FD Indications ... ?
- How was doing the THS ?
Similitudes with AF447 are all over the place.
This time at least the STALL warning never quit ... The conditions were not met or the program was modified ... ?