Jumpseater, I was speaking metaphorically not literally. I was suggesting a simplistic legal cross examination.
I have been there and know the simple questions asked where the witness is limited to yes/no answers or required to give an equivocal answer that casts doubt on their testimony.
Essentially I was suggesting that the created video, and it was mentioned here that it was a succession of stills, not a Photoshop, would be open to legal challenge. That the witnesses credibility would be challenged. The challenge would include the witnesses knowledge of a barrel role if that was the legal charge.
I know I could not give testimony to confirm or refute a barrel roll.
PS, BTW, according to the Vulcan Release Service low level is defined as below 10,000 feet. We did the low level high speed RTS trial and it was at 10,000 feet.