All this chatter about what various governments want, about 'agenda's', unnamed 'officials' speaking on condition af anonimity, conspiracies etc. is really affecting the signal to noise ratio in an otherwise interesting discussion.
Agreed. I've been following the thread since day one. It has got really valuable contributions, analyzing factual data, providing images as they were released, and posting news updates. But, for a couple of days now, it's become sort of a chat in the lines of "my viewpoint is right no matter what the final report will tell". Special thanks to the ones who tried to analyze the video (or videos if they're actually two) in a scientific way. Good work.