Originally Posted by
mickjoebill
. . . I have a good idea of how explosions are imaged by video cameras.
The disperancy in the black level of smoke versus the airframe is my main issue.
Yes if the video is real the smoke could have been processed separately to alter its black level for dramatic effect. . . .
However a common trick to help marry composite elements is to leave or make the frame wobbly.
Am I correct in assuming that you say there are three elements to the video:
An aircraft in flight
An explosion
A smoke trail
That the first two are genuine but independent and that all three have been fused in to one video?
I would not disagree with that.
My initial post was only to cast doubt on the assertion that the explosion was FAKE as opposed to the whole composition being fake.