Originally Posted by
Rhino power
I don't want to jump the gun in respect to the SDSR, and this is just my opinion, but I highly suspect that article is bs for several reasons; firstly given the commitment to the 2% of GDP, there should *theoretically* be enough money (but that's debatable), and more importantly the MOD released this statement in the defence news today regarding the Times' speculation as to an MPA contract - "The MOD continues to assess future requirements as part of the work we are doing on the Strategic Defence and Security Review (SDSR). No decisions have been taken"