Moderators
I have just been banned from chatting on the thread about the marine who shot the injured man.
I don't really have problem with that, it's your trainset and I wind people up. It's happened before and I'm sure it will happen again.
I do however have a problem with your then selectively deciding which posts are left to make a more anodyne discussion.
I don't think that any of us were being too offensive, and I think that the discussion was relevant to the point.
Yes we had moved on to the Geneva convention, but is that too much thread drift to a case about an illegal killing in a war?
I don't normally whinge when banned, but I think the thread is lesser for the redactions and gives a false impression of the variety of feelings on the matter.