There is so much wheat and chaff in this thread that I hope any lawyer building a case based on the information gleaned in this 'professional pilots forum' gets it sifted. (Reely340's last post about practise EOL's being a classic example)
Please elaborate
If pilots do not regulary pratice "twin EOL" (at least with power recovery at 10ft AGL), how should they be able to survive twin flame outs?
I'd say besides all switch position mishandling and warning bells ignorance the main issue here is
the
demonstrated inability of a +5000h CPL to properly autorotate
to somewhere close to ground.
(according to the report he did try, passing the 97% rrpm threshold multiple times)
Or would you pull out the exposure time vs. probability regime
and file such incindents under **** happens?
