I am glad that you are amused, T&N. However, far from 'ignoring' the figures you quote I used them in my reply to you (see paragraph three of my earlier posting). And, no, I do not label any of the statistics provided as invalid. I argued that we cannot know which set of data quoted have used the superior methodology in reaching their conclusions. By the way, statistical data (especially forecasts) are subject to inaccuracy whoever the sponsor / publisher may be. That includes Spatial, Sheffield, HMG agencies and everybody else.
Ah, my MP. Well, I haven't raised the subject of my local MP at all. But it just so happens that he is brother to a good friend of mine. Maybe I should take up your suggestion and have a chat!
Interesting to note that you have resorted to the 'personal attack' style of response again. I guess asking you to justify your one-man national opinion survey was a bit much?