Effendi
Thank you, I don't think much of you, either.
You miss the point. There have been incident(s), but the point I was making was that the PE article is innacurrate. I have pointed the errors out, they are easily verifiable and they cast serious doubt on the credibility of the reporting. My credibility is not established (or otherwise) by any incidents that have occurred. What I have provided is some facts- check them for yourself.
But then, maybe you would rather not let the facts get in the way of a good story???
As is often the case with journos, a kernel of truth is used to construct an outrageous lie.