It would be lovely to believe that Joseph and I agree entirely, was previously using NZ Regs and found them to be fantastic! But unfortunately the way things are written leaves it far too open to interpretation right now.
For instance NZ define Aerobatic Flight as such:
Aerobatic flight means—
(1) an intentional manoeuvre in which the aircraft is in sustained
inverted flight or is rolled from upright to inverted or from
inverted to upright position; or
(2) manoeuvres such as rolls, loops, spins, upward vertical flight
culminating in a stall turn, hammerhead or whip stall, or a
combination of such manoeuvres:
Makes a lot more clear cut, but CASA try to give a super fancy definition which leaves it open to interpretation which was my understanding for the reasoning behind putting the old line in under CAR 155 so why is it that this has been taken out and has not been put back in in some way, shape or form?