PPRuNe Forums - View Single Post - Why didn't Sikorsky try a CH-37 with turbines?
Old 1st Sep 2015, 05:26
  #14 (permalink)  
Luther Sebastian
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Harwich UK
Age: 65
Posts: 68
Received 10 Likes on 6 Posts
Thanks for all the replies (so far!). It never occurred to me that the main reason for having the engines on outriggers was because they were large radials. I was naively expecting the turbines to go in the same place, but you can have a lot of the same dynamic parts and still end up looking a lot different.

Mind you, what else (with a rotor) could you drive a jeep out the front of?
Luther Sebastian is offline