Clearly not a very forward looking company and just ruthlessly chop and change as and when they feel like to squeeze current yields to the maximum.
That's
exactly and precisely Ryanair got to be a market leader. "Forward looking" is just marketing BS come on.
Is there anyway MAG might be doing a bit of stirring in the background, and applying some passive pressure on the airline, by reminding the travellng public of what the airline committed too, a few year back?!
I would be VERY surprised as this is not how business is conducted. MAG would put in place a charging framework to allow EZY to drive up yields at STN, however given the current focus on getting under one roof at LGW, I rather suspect they're concentrating on London elsewhere right now. Any route launch is a commercial decision for an airline usually, are the contractual terms public and are EZY bound legally to grow at STN? If not, forget it.