Strake
I can see many differences. Negligence being one.
Everything we do carries risk.
The evidence shows that the risk from airshows is tiny.
Even 1 in 1000000000 chances happen occasionally.
A huge proportion of motorbike rides are purely for the entertainment of the rider. When a motorbike hits a pedestrian, they are innocent too. Do we ban bikes?
When a cricket ball/baseball flies into the crowd, occasionally someone gets hurt.
Ban Cricket?
Everyone is going to die.
That is unavoidable
Every death we delay by banning something merely adds to the death toll from something else.
You might, quite reasonably, say that at least we have extended the life a bit.
My answer would be that be what is the point in living longer if you have banned all the fun things?
I don't believe, as many seem to at present, that the goal of life should be to persist as long as possible.