I merely pointed out that their option is to either throw the lot in the bin and say "we wasted all this time and money for nothing," or keep going.
What would you do? And why would you say Mark Skidmore doesn't have the 'expertise' to bring it to a conclusion? What sort of expertise would be needed? These are not facetious questions, I just don't understand the absolutely entrenched view espoused by some that CASA couldn't possibly do anything good, ever. Reading back over this and other threads on the subject, that's a common theme, but it's just too easy to throw out a 'they're a bunch of dickheads' comment, which doesn't achieve much.
I agree (as I already alluded to above) that this reform process has been a big expensive shambles, no argument there.