Well guys, we're getting closer to the real issue here....as drawn out by Monsieur Le Pingouin and others.
Dick wants terminal separation for IFRS, in Class E, in some locations with surveillance and in some locations without surveillance coverage...and he does not believe that "one in and one out" would be required in the non-surveillance locations. I hope that's a fair summary.
Now...how is that done?
Let's, for the moment, put aside the obvious, to most, resources question and assume it will cost nothing extra to get this up and running....and resolve the only other outstanding issue....what are the separation standards used, obviously in the USA, that allow such a "one in and one out" situation to be avoided?
