PPRuNe Forums - View Single Post - 'Partial Panel', why not 'NO Panel'
View Single Post
Old 4th Aug 2015, 13:14
  #1 (permalink)  
phiggsbroadband
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Wales
Posts: 532
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
'Partial Panel', why not 'NO Panel'

I was just looking at a cold-war jet that had most of its instruments removed, and felt that was a pity... But, at a push, just how un-flyable is an aircraft with no instruments?


Whilst under instruction in a glider, my instructor would tell me to keep my eyes 'outside the cockpit'. I could even trim by feel of the position of the trim lever. Admittedly the air-sound on the Perspex, was a bit of a give-away for an airspeed check, and the position of the nose on the horizon was another good indication.


Maybe instead of Partial-Panel, a full No-Panel circuit could be flown in an SEP airplane. It would rely on you knowing the settings by feel, and the engine revs by sound. Also to pay attention to the trim index, instead of just adding a few nobbles... (I realise some gliders have spring loaded trimmers, which could pose more of a problem.)
phiggsbroadband is offline