PPRuNe Forums - View Single Post - USAF T-X - here we go again
View Single Post
Old 21st Jul 2015, 17:36
  #12 (permalink)  
Heathrow Harry
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: London
Posts: 7,072
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
the full g requirement is in "Flight"

I can see the reasons but doesn't anyone look at recent procurement issues and say

"This is what we can afford for x hundred trainers, this is what the constructors can REALLY achieve without going crazy - let's design for that?"

it's only a trainer after all - not a B-52/B-1 replacement.................
Heathrow Harry is offline