Some of the comments on this thread making fatuous comparisons between tasks, theatres of operation or eras are contemptible in the extreme and verge on a return to a culture of using terms such as "man-up" or LMF. The mechanism by which a serviceperson begins suffering with post-traumatic stress is irrelevant, what's important is that it is recognised and treated, whilst concurrently the risk of others suffering in the same way is mitigated/minimised or managed within the bounds of practicability.
As for BEagle, words fail me. I can only assume that you are being deliberately contrary in order to provoke debate. That, or you are just an out of touch curmudgeon displaying a complete and studied absence of understanding of the modern operating environment.