More CASA obfuscation?

[Arm out the window]

From Part 61 MOS:

A5.1 – Enter and recover from stall

(a) perform pre-manoeuvre checks for stalling;

(b) recognise stall signs and symptoms;

(c) control the aeroplane by applying the required pitch, roll and yaw inputs as appropriate in a smooth, coordinated manner, trims aeroplane accurately to enter and recover from the following manoeuvres:

(i) incipient stall;

(ii) except for multi-engine aeroplanes, stall with full power applied;

(iii) stall without power applied;

(iv) stall under the following conditions:

(A) straight and level flight;

(B) except for multi-engine aeroplanes, climbing;

(C) except for multi-engine aeroplanes, descending;

(D) approach to land configuration;

(E) except for multi-engine aeroplanes, turning;

(d) perform stall recovery as follows:

(i) positively reduce angle of attach;

(ii) use power available and excess height to increase the aircraft energy state;

(iii) minimise height loss for simulated low altitude condition;

(iv) re-establish desired flight path and aircraft control;

(e) recover from stall in simulated partial and complete engine failure configurations.

Why don't you put up a better set of competency standards then, LeadSled?
What would you prefer?

(i) Using seat of pants, recognises conditions leading to stall;

(ii) Discontinues manoeuver before stall actually occurs;

(iii) There is no step (iii)