Pointing out that Mr Skidmore has now demontrated an unwillingness or inablity to make substantial changes, despite the findings of the aviation accident investigation inquiry and the recommendations of the aviation safety regulatory review, is not defeatist moaning. It is merely to note that Mr Skidmore has become part of a continuing problem. A disappointing conclusion for some, but an important one, as it means the strategies and energies of those pressing for change will have to be adjusted and refocussed accordingly.
I anticipate that those who initially put faith in Mr Skidmore will now shift their attention to Mr Boyd. Time will tell whether Mr Boyd has sufficient support on the Board, and energy, to make a difference.