Ken
You stated:
The F-35 is not nor was it ever intended to be an air superiority fighter.
I gave you two sourced quotes in which it was advertised as exactly that.
You then
defended those statements (Davis and Flynn) - and not factually, but by attacking anyone who attaches any significance to the report leaked on Monday.
So you're defending people who contradicted your first statement. Do you wonder that people are getting a bit
ed off, or is that your intention? Do you have any consistent viewpoint, or are you just trying to muddy a discussion that's not going your way?