Originally Posted by FOD
others who seem to have deliberately misinterpreted the facts to support their own viewpoint (e.g. claiming this trial was intended to demonstrate the dogfighting capability of a properly kitted-out F-35 - so wrong in so many ways as even a cursory glance reveals).
Lovely post and beautifully supportive, but lacking in substance and evidence. Who made the claims you attack? In what ways were their claims wrong (you claim there were so many of them)? What did your cursory glances reveal?
Way more important, in what way do you believe "the facts" we're misinterpreted?
You make a bold statement, now back it up and answer my questions.