I would agree with the person who noted the marked difference in the summary and the report conclusions. The summary looks hurried, as if they ran out of paper or something...
Maybe I am being mischevous but being an old Africa hand you could be forgiven for assuming that SACAA wrote the body of the report and ACSA wrote the summary. Whatever happened, it is embarrassing that the summary perversely leads the reader to form a different (and incomplete) opinion on causation than they would if they read the main report on its own. It needs to be fixed and re-issued if it is to be credible on the world stage. I won't hold my breath.
P