that accident could have been prevented if the medics did their job
I have found that most AMEs; service and civilian; took the view that their job was to help people retain their medical category rather than downgrade them. If there was an error it was not to clearly state at a much earlier stage the possible prognosis for the condition and its implications. It might have meant that the later AMEs would have had better guidance for their assessments.
Further more the old boys network was culpable (sic)
You don't appear to have thoroughly read the accident report, or if you have, you haven't understood the process by which the decision was made.
Then again some missing medical history from the medical branch, ( is that a shredder I can hear)
Nothing to do with his two exchange tours when his PMEs were not carried out by UK service examiners? Not everything follows you home, it's a fact. Was it relevant anyway?
YS