Originally Posted by
Lead Balloon
From the very article you cited, yr right and Perspective:In other words, the regulatory position was (and remains) precisely as LeadSled has described, and you r both rong.
*
Um bill. It was mandated by an Australian AD. It didn't mandate the SB. It mandated an Ad which in its frame work mandated the SB. This was normal practice at that time. Now Casa would not make it an Ad it would come out as a country of origin AD. That is unless an extremely urgent Ad is required then it may be implemented by an Australian Ad.
However as I have said SB have to be done on Class A aircraft.
But nice diversion bill. And yes it says different but we know it's you.