That's not weird for me! I mean... you agree with one single engine vs twin engine and you don't agree with a single turbine? How is that?
Meanwhile, the profile of the potential client is something like 20-25 flight hours per month with flights no more than 250nm one way. The routes are mostly over mountains with lowest IFR enroute level being FL110. Although I will feel comfortable flying at FL280 over those mountains in a Meridian Turboprop, cost wise it wouldn't be economical to fly a turboprop over such short distances vs a twin piston engine. So I think it would be a good idea a Seneca V equipped with oxygen system for this kind of operations. What do you think? Other suggestions?