HH, JF,
Thanks for coming back. On the RN/RAF issues:
Over the years, I have come to accept and understand where Air Forces come from. They exist to apply 'Air Power', which in their view possesses unique and separate qualities that supersede and avoid the need for land and sea warfare. This capability must be commended by 'air-minded' officers, i.e. Air Force officers.
Navies that use aircraft possess doctrines of applying of 'power on and from the sea' - 'air power' exists as part of an overall fleet's capabilities. These doctrines reflect the importance of being able to move around the oceans without let or hindrance, protecting national maritime assets and using manoeuvre around coastlines to wage war. In this scenario, aircraft at sea must come under the tactical command of the Fleet Commander.
These two approaches can't readily be reconciled. JFH showed that. They could, however, be made to co-exist to the UK's advantage. Give the RN the F-35s it needs to to its job from the carriers, and the RAF the aircraft it needs - the F-35A (or more probably the F-35C - even more range, and probe compatible with the UK's tanker fleet). Let each service command and employ their aircraft as they see fit. Leverage the F-35's commonality to build a common support system.
Basically, adopt the model used by every other nation in the world operating fixed wing aircraft at sea. It's not rocket science.
Best Regards as ever,
Engines