Originally Posted by
le Pingouin
Sorry, that's not the way it works. If I think there's a reasonable chance the extra dozen conflicts and additional complexity you'll create by wandering across my airspace contrary to the general traffic flow will up the workload to potentially unsafe levels then I'd be mad to let you in.
Perhaps an option would be to have our controllers trained on higher volume scenarios. With a mix of GA and RPT.
If we don't have enough controllers say something. Don't use that as an excuse to provide a poor service, instead speak up and say something or how could anything change?
Isn't there a national traffic Center in Canberra that is supposed to be looking at volume and controller numbers? Obviously not working out to the benefit of service paying customers. Why is my $ worth less than someone else's?