Sorry TC, but as you told us, your words were quite specific and specially chosen.
"No-ONE - not the military , nor civvies teach double engine failure practice and this has been the case for ages."
Those words are just as specific as the words 'Double Engine Failure - Autorotation' as seen in the EC135 Type Rating video at 2:36, a point in the video when double engine failure is being practised. Maybe the words 'Simulator Double Engine Failure' aren't clear enough in the HeliFlight video. Maybe the autorotation of the BO105 wasn't clear enough to be recognised as Double Engine Failure Practise
ALL YOUR SODDING EXAMPLES ARE EITHER SIMULATORS OR AUTO ROTATIONS. I MADE IT ABUNDANTLY CLEAR IN MY FIRST POST AND THEN RE-ITERATED IT IN MY SECOND POST THAT SIMULATORS AND AUTO ROTATIONS ARE NOT ENGINE OFF'S.
DO YOU UNDERSTAND THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN SIMULATED EOL'S / AUTOROTATIONS TO THE DECK and ENGINES OFF LANDINGS?
Is that all of the sodding examples ... apart from the S-92 and Viper videos?
This one not count either?