Lookee leftie..." defending his(sic) staff is one of the attributes we expect from a good leader"
And with CAsA this defence, also in the case of indefencibles is legion.
The late Loud Screamer made a pitch in a Senate hearing, 2011?, on how he would protect "his staff" at all costs from "unwarranted demagoguery" and he rattled off a litany of other things maybe alleged, and ended up choking on his own wordy vomitus and failed to complete the sentence.!
Had he passed the English licence test, ya reckon?.
So he even took that defence ..at very great expense to the taxpayer, for three staff persons who had committed gross illegalities, in the "process" of dealing with an aviation client, all aided and abetted by "The System".
Which immediately proved to me his "ceo" credentials had absolutely NO value whatsoever, except to corruption and cronyism.
Its a game still being played out in the halls of Fort Fumble, as I can attest. having recently received a three page "thesis" from Dr Hoodoo Voodoo on how lies are not lies or untruths, but "just discrepancies in wording".
Dontja luv 'em! Wonderful think there Doctor !
Its CYA 101 in full swing...protection is all.
We, the CAsA people do no wrong
Response letter from bureaurats are not supposed to deal with the issues, they either attack you or hit you with a fluffy response that actually says nothing....hopefully then you will tire of corresponding and just go away.