PPRuNe Forums - View Single Post - automation...civilian vs military attitudes
Old 30th Apr 2015, 09:08
  #34 (permalink)  
ShotOne
 
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: Manchester, UK
Posts: 1,958
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It's one thing to make the obvious observation that there was confusion on the flight deck, but quite a stretch to single out one particular action and state it was carried out because they misunderstood the function of a specific system."They didn't operate the takeover button":who's "they"? Which one should have been pressed? Your statement pre-supposes one pilot had accurately diagnosed the problem. I don't believe they did -and for much of the fatal descent were trying to make sense of conflicting alarms and information(the stall warning only sounded for a relatively short period but, confusingly for them, recurred when the stick was pushed forward). While we can agree that many things went terribly wrong, where does that leave us in respect of the OP's question? One could pluck aspects of this tragedy to support or refute many opinions. Certainly I'm not aware of any operator, military or civil,which practices stall recovery for large transport aircraft.

Last edited by ShotOne; 30th Apr 2015 at 09:56.
ShotOne is offline