donpizmeov, i certainly am not complaining about that.
I mean that imho i do believe most of the guys i know were really fitting the standarts of a major flag carrier airline. However for some reason they have been eliminated on the last day of assessments. Most of them have joined to QR and EY. Now what i mean is "was the other companies wrong and EK was right?". Because they are pretty successful and stable guys, also have a really good level of both technical and practical knowledge(CRM, decision making with the help of inputs) have been eliminated, and if i know the true mentality of EK, instead of calling those guys back and making another objective assessment on them, they would rather lower their limits.
If they don't meet the standarts, they don't meet the standarts. But in this case the question raises; what are the standarts of EK concluding the technical knowledge, simulator success(with the type they haven't flown before) and practical thinking style? Because they have all passed those phases on the first day of assessments.