Door not culpable?
To the people saying it's not the door but it's the person: if you employ some reductionist thought process - would you disagree that opening the door could have altered the course of events from what is available as information? I am not sure it would have changed the ultimate outcome (may have been too late) but I am sure it would have changed the course of events. So the door problem needs to be addressed period.
Last edited by Ozmd; 28th Mar 2015 at 23:32.
Reason: Grammar; clearing ambiguity