S.o.S.
No particular cheekiness was intended, merely a polite request for clarification of a new and much appreciated ground rule. Civility and ground rules do, after all, form part of the base line of good CRM. It's kind of you to be so forthcoming and I'm sure that your card system will be much appreciated as a worthy and sportsmanlike successor system to that of your most illustrious predecessor. As a long time poster on these erudite pages; I have absolutely no wish to push any boundaries and many thanks to you for taking the time to respond. It has always been completely understood that Mods have to justify nothing and after reading through the MH370/GW9525 threads the necessity for that authority become apparent.
Please excuse the digression from the thread and so back on point. Reading through the link provided below would appear to imply that Air Canada disavow themselves of any liability for allergies caused by nuts and seafood in any of their menus. By extension therefore, the girl friend is in 'danger' in any class of travel on that airline although logic would indicate that this would be less so back with the riff raff.
aircanada.com - Travel Info - Special Meals