PPRuNe Forums - View Single Post - Performance based on which CofG?
View Single Post
Old 17th Mar 2015, 19:28
  #15 (permalink)  
Linktrained
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Devonshire
Age: 96
Posts: 297
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Boeing Airliner of January 1974 (!) under "Fuel Conservation at a Glance" states :-
"Aft c. g. shift ( per 4% max shift) 0.5 % for 707, 727 and 737
0.2 % for 747 "


I never had any information on the only DC3 ( one with a Starboard door that I flew as "F/O on freight" in 1951, and so beyond my pay grade.)


With a normally full load of charter passengers, the baggage and flight spares would be distributed " 2/3 forward, 1/3 aft " and on several later types of larger aircraft.
Perhaps the Chief in Charge of these matters had read your reason, in #8 in (a) to keep the load in the "Tested for C of A." position, rather than (b) "for minimal cruising drag".


Load sheets were graphical and could have had an extra line printed, between the limits, to indicate the " Optimum Loading"

Last edited by Linktrained; 17th Mar 2015 at 19:34. Reason: typing
Linktrained is offline