The news is getting some coverage up here but from what I read on pprune this new excuse that the MAA investigation is sufficient doesn't stand up and is at odds with what the Procurator Fiscal and Crown Office have been saying.
In a statement, the Crown Office said: "After thorough consideration of the circumstances of the case, Crown Counsel have concluded that all the relevant issues have been comprehensively examined in the course of the Military Aviation Authority report and could not have been better considered in any FAI.
I guess pprune is a bit off on then?
PS 10 seconds on Google is all it takes guys.