PPRuNe Forums - View Single Post - MERGED: MBF rule change-Vote No?
View Single Post
Old 7th Mar 2015, 19:50
  #25 (permalink)  
dirty deeds
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Sydney
Posts: 209
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Creampuff,

Yes, authority based submissions from the people who wrote the rule, exactly. Once again thanks for pointing this out. Your responses are really helpful and provide excellent input to help people understand the process of the court.

Maybe we should start another thread, torts and common law...lol!

Once again you are absolutely 100% correct, it doesn't prevent the MBF from paying compensation, just remember if it does, any other stauatory authority will offset their payments. I cannot remember, but maybe this hadn't been pointed out yet, sorry if I forgot to.

Members do need to get their head around these rule changes, and thank you for proving me the opportunity to do so. It's been a good debate and your inputs to the discussion have been helpful in proving the basis to explain just one of these rule changes.
dirty deeds is offline