Context exactly, and they will call to stand those that wrote the rule to explain to the individual and the court its true meaning.
No. The Court won't do that.
The Court will accept authority-based submissions as to the proper interpretation of the words, in context, and the Court will decide and explain to the parties what the words mean as a matter of law.
Why the interest in something you have no vested interest in?
My religion requires me to.
It's not the MBF that's creates the offsets guys, it's the workcover and insurance policies that do.
But that doesn't prevent the MBF from paying compensation. It's the other way around.
I'd suggest that MBF members first need to get their head around what the current rule means and how it's administered by the MBF. I anticipate many members may be in for a light-bulb moment.