WWW
I could have perfectly legitimately posted as just a former student, even under a different name (from my other ISP so my TCP/IP address would be unconnected) but never desired to be anything but above-board. I could also have posted what I know about one or two other schools that is less than complimentary, but have never done so as it is from sources (reliable ones) not my own observation. I think I have been fair.
The reason I post only good things about SFT is that I never had cause to complain. Yes there were things that were less-than-perfect, as in every organisation, but never to the extent that I felt the need to complain to SFT as my training provider, so they were not really important and it would be unfair to bring them up here. I am also the solution to the most significant imperfection - lack of a consistant General Nav instructor/course - so this is no longer an issue.
Given this lack of complaint, the outstanding factors of SFT were positive - friendliness, helpfulness, quality of instruction, location, price. These are, therefore, the things I mention. Thank you for allowing me the perfect opportunity to mention them again
.
Yours aye,
SC