Missed the debate unfortunately, was it good?
Very poor fair, I had not heard of Ian King and to be honest I now know why.
Come back Paxman all is forgiven, even "Philomena Cunk" would be more forensic.
It was trailed as a Q and A but save for 3 questions from "TWITland" it was really just a forum for the respective parties to restate their case.
No questioning of the LGW CEO about quite how they actually turn LGW into hub when it's clear there is little demand from the carriers who are part of the problem at LHR and see LGW as an irrelevance.
No questioning of the LHR CEO about the various issues re cost which is touted at a higher figure than The Channel Tunnel !