Airbus transparency
Airbus needs to be more transparent, as they have been obliviously stuff that needs to be out there. ( We are not even getting into the Electrical abnormals with all the modifications that have had to be done, consequences where you can lose all your screens or comms,etc. ) Airbus needs to provide more information to pilots on this stuff, whether it is pretty or not. Airbus the truth comes out in the end. ( In normal ops when you are fatigued the 320 remains a decent safe airplane to fly when you are doing a lot of sectors and tired.)
Also ĻAirbus had simply stated in training and manuals that having one F/D of and one on would inhibit Alpha Floor, {it was neither taught or in the manuals at this time} this crash would simply not have taken placeĻ
Airbus stated never have on FD and on FD off, but yes should told us more about what they knew.
Itīs ironic and a contradiction, to train pilots not to think outside the box.
But pilots have had to go outside the box switching off Two ADRs to get too Alternate law. Look at Lufthansa.
Here we are with people questioning wether FACs or ADRs should be switched off.
It appears that the Alpha Prot OEB is not enough, or is it ?